Friday Coffee Chat (17)–Better Than The Book








The Movie/TV Show is Better Than the Book!


Last week on Friday Coffee Chat we talked about whether or not we imagine everything we read right down to length of someone’s hair. I found out that I’m somewhat of an oddity because I am one of those people that imagines everything, but there are a few people that read the same way I do! It makes me feel like less of a freak! Jennifer at Girls Gone Reading talked about whether or not we require great lines in books to really love them. Make sure you check out Girls Gone Reading’s post this week on Friday Coffee Chat after you comment here.

_____________________________________________________________

This morning, one of my friends posted an article from the Huffington Post on my Facebook page talking about movies that are better than their paper counterparts. Is this possible? Blasphemy you say? Surely there must be a movie or TV show that you saw that a) was better than the book, b) made you feel it was unnecessary to read the book, or c) was just as good as the book. I definitely have a few shows and movies that are amazing.

I’m just going to admit it right off the bat. I loved Sense and Sensibility starring Emma Thompson. I could watch it OVER and OVER again. Could I read the book over and over?…hmmmm…No. I read it, and maybe someday I’ll read it again, but for now, I’m good snuggling up on the couch with my dogs and watching the movie. I think most Jane Austen fans would think that was blasphemous because the movie does combine some characters and inevitably left things out. Emma Thompson was also older than Eleanor Dashwood was supposed to be. I don’t care. I love her. She’s my favorite actress and I could watch that movie forever!


Field of Dreams is another movie that I don’t know if it’s better than the book, Shoeless Joe by W.P. Kinsella, but it comes pretty close. I mean, that scene with Annie when she is protesting at the school board meeting to ban books is perfect. “You want to step outside you Nazi cow?!!!” Now tell me there is a better line than that?! Atonement is another movie that I thought was just as good as the book. The film was beautiful and stayed very faithful to the story. Even the casting was perfect for the film.



In television, Band of Brothers is probably one of my all-time favorites. I actually do like it better than the book because I think it captured the essence of brotherhood better. The book was fantastic as well, but the mini-series I watch several times a year. I watch it so often that I know some of the lines in each of the episodes and I even know most of the more minor characters (who aren’t really ‘characters’ since they were real people).





The other show that I haven’t read the book for, but it’s on my short list of non-fiction that I MUST read is The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood by David Simon and Edward Burns which HBO’s The Wire is loosely based on. The Wire is simply the best television series I have ever seen in my life. The book itself actually had a mini-series that was produced before The Wire, and I need to see that as well. It’s an amazing show.

…And my last TV show, is True Blood. The show is SO much better than the books (of which I have only read four). The books are ok, but the show is just amazingly written. The characters are better, the situations are better…but Bill is still as boring as ever and Sookie is still just as life-sucking as ever. It’s the supporting cast and writing in that show that makes it worth watching and the dialogue is so good! I love it.

So the questions for this week are:
  • What movies or TV shows do you think are BETTER than the book and tell us all why you think that.
  • Are there any movies or TV shows you think are comparable to the book and you enjoy them equally?
  • What TV shows or movies have you seen that make you want to read the book?

Comments (60)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Such an EASY question this week! I can tell you which movie is better than the book, and I haven't even seen the movie. Can you guess? I've been going on about this book a bit, because I did a read-a-long of it, with some of your friends.

They told me the movie (which I hadn't seen) was so good that I had to join them in reading the book (which I hadn't read). I was not the only one to be disappointed with the book, some of the movie-lovers were, too!

The book? The Princess Bride by William Goldman. I didn't think it was great. And since I was talked into reading it because lots of people loved the movie, I'm guessing the movie is way better than the book! :-)
My recent post Friday Blog Hop
4 replies · active 751 weeks ago
Easy...Fight Club the movie was WAY better for me. The book was too graphic and I couldn't get through it.
My recent post Friday Coffee Chat- Crazies with a Book Deal
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I guess I'm going to be different than the others here...In my life as both Bookworm and Moviebuff, I'VE NEVER SEEN any movie better than the book, it is either as equally good or worse.

The equally good ones are: The Lord Of The Rings, I've read the book 3 times going on 4th and the have watched the movie countless time. The Green Mile. The Jurasic Park (only the first, the 2nd is way worse than the book), etc.

The worse ones are: The Shining, Battle Royale, and many that I couldn't remember anymore.

There are many movies I want to read after watching it. Breakfast on Pluto is one of them, this is not my kind of book but Cillian Murphy's great performance makes me want to read the book and see how Kitten appears in my mind. The story is about the life of a transvestite. Ghost Writer and Shutter Island are also another books I love to read after watching the movie.

My recent post Turtle Puzzle
2 replies · active 751 weeks ago
Oh my. Big topic today ;) I don't watch a lot of TV or movies so I'm really not sure... I can't think of anything off the top of my head to be honest. Except that I'm sure I've watched movies that were based on books and I didn't even realize it.

Oh wait, umm... I liked Pride and Prejudice movie better than the book. Oops.
My recent post Review- Heart-Shaped Box by Joe Hill
4 replies · active 751 weeks ago
I think Owen Sheers the poet and Novelist summed it up recently when I saw him, a film is only ever a distant cousin to the book ,band of brothers maybe is the best of the ones you ve choosen and reminds me to mention to my amanda that the pacific has just come out on dvd againd as a gentle hint for christmas lol ,all the best stu
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
Hands down PS I Love You was waaaay better than the book.

I really liked Band of Brothers, both the book and the mini-series -- I couldn't put the book down!
My recent post Book Blogger Hop
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
The Hours!!!!! 100 million times better than the book, which was horrible. The movie, on the other hand, is my favorite ever and I've seen it literally over 100 times.
My recent post Literary Blog Hop
2 replies · active 751 weeks ago
I generally avoid movies based on books. But I do have one example of a movie being waaaaaayyyy better than the book. I loathed Cold Mountain in book form...I thought it was boring. The pages and pages of descriptions as he walked home from the war...urg. The movie, however, I enjoyed.
My recent post The Widower’s Tale
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
I agree with Amanda about The Hours - loved the movie, could not get through the book even though it's short. My vote along with softdrink is for Cold Mountain. Hated the book. It was literally putting me to sleep (on audio) and I was driving off the road! Bleh. I stopped reading 2/3 through. I only liked the parts where the neighbor girl was teaching Ada how to farm etc. The movie was decent though. Largely because it was only 2 hours.
My recent post Book Beginnings on Friday
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I loved the movie Big Fish and only thought the book was so-so. That's about the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
My recent post Blog Hop!
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Obviously I think the BBC mini-series of Pride & Prejudice is as good as the book! It was awesome.

I also think A Walk to Remember is as good as the book. I love the book, but the movie was really well done too!

Great topic :)
My recent post Winner- Harry Potter Extravaganza &amp The Night Wanderer
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
I totally agree with you on Sense and Sensibility! I love that movie and the book was one of my least favorites of Austen's.

I also think Emma was fantastic (the new one) and topped the actual novel itself.

I love watching Castle and discovered I can't stand reading the books they are putting out (oh my goodness, they are horrible).

Here's an interesting conundrum. I love watching The Princess Bride and I love the Book as well - each for totally different reasons. I think it's one of those rare exceptions where the book = movie.

(and can I just say.. I love your Friday discussions and look forward to them all week!)
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
I'll go with The Jane Austen Book Club (liked the book, really liked the movie-- the pacing was much better in the movie) and Inkheart (enjoyed the movie, found the book tedious).

My recent post Audio Review- A Fatal Grace by Louise Penny
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
Sorry, Carin, but True Blood does not qualify for "movie is better than the book". It sucks! But you know my opinion on that already, :) .

I can't think of a lot of movies that I found better than the book, but only of a handful.
The LOTR trilogy is certainly one of them. I found the books slightly lengthy, but Peter Jackson did a wonderful job adapting them. Even considering the changes they made the films are perfect. I don't know how often I have seen them. I read the books when I was a kid and hated them, then I re-read them after watching the movies and liked them better but I still prefer the films by far.
Then, after the recent readlong, I must admit that "The Princess Bride" is much better as a film than as a book. The re-read was tedious and I DNF at all. Without the long winded comments of the author, the plot was much more digestible .

A few more films come to my mind where I liked both, book and film, equally. One is "Misery" by Stephen King which was made into an awesome movie. Then "A room with a view" by E.M. Forster and the film from 1985. And "Dangerous Liaisons" by Choderlos de Laclos and the film with John Malkovich and Glenn Close. Even though the book is a novel written in letters they adapted it wonderfully.Actually, now that I am looking at who directed those movies I am not at all surprised that I like them, since Rob Reiner (Princess Bride and Misery), James Ivory and Stephen Frears are usually safe bets.
I think for me it is all about the cast and how the director approaches the book. And those three (and I think I can probably include Peter Jackson, even though I haven't seen anything else by him, since LOTR was his first big project) just seem to do it right for me.
I tend to like watching the classics better than reading them if the adaptation is well done. BBC has been doing a really good job with what has been aired on PBS Masterpiece Classics; I can't wait for the new season! You have to appreciate the well trained British actors.

I tend to agree about LOTR, I almost like the Peter Jackson movies better than the books… almost :)
2 replies · active 751 weeks ago
Oh, speaking of BBC, something else just came to my mind.
The TV series I, Claudius after the book by Robert Graves. The book was already wonderful and the TV series was awesome. Top actors all of them (even if the beauty of the supposedly beautiful women was questionable). I loved that series and bought it on DVD recently.
The PBS/Granada show done in the 80's of Evelyn Waugh's BRIDESHEAD REVISITED was as good as, if not the tiniest bit better than the book. (NOT the recent film which changed several scenes and I refuse to see.) Michael Connelly's excellent thriller BLOOD WORK was butchered by Clint Eastwood - they even changed the identity of the killer! So, book DEFINITELY better. JURASSIC PARK, the film, was visually stunning so in that respect it was better than the book. But the book by Michael Crichton was stunning in its own way. TIMELINE by Michael Crichton, the book is so much better than the film Though the film doesn't stink. PERSUASION by Jane Austen, which I am currently rereading. I've liked the films and shows, but I've yet to see an ULTIMATE Persusasion. Maybe the one with Ciaran Hind?
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
I think I mean Ciaran Hinds. Anyway, I'd also add the JANE EYRE with Timothy Dalton - as good as the book if not the tiniest bit better. BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, though the 'book' is actually a short story. Both versions heartbreakingly good.
I loved them both for slightly different reasons.

Great topic. As usual. :)
My recent post Friday Library Loot
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Honestly, I think the Lord of the Rings movies are much better than the books. I could hardly pull myself through book 1 and had to stop half way through book 2. Impossible for me, but I LOVE LOVE LOVE the movies.
My recent post Seed Seeker - Pamela Sargent
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago
Heh...okay, once again, Julia and Julia was a great movie, and a crappy read! Why? Because the movie was way more Julia than Julie, and the casting was perfect. Now we can move on....in general, if I know and love the book, I hardly ever like the movie as much. If I see the movie first, then I usually enjoy it for what it is, even if the book ends up being better. Example: The Pelican Brief. I loved the movie, which I saw first, then loved the book even more!
My recent post Thankful Thursday
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago
I am going to go out on a limb and say that I enjoy the TV show, Bones, more than I enjoy Kathy Reichs' books. That is saying a lot since I love her books, but the chemistry of the cast just does it for me even more.
My recent post The Breaking of Eggs- A Novel by Jim Powell Review
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago
Oh, PELICAN BRIEF, good choice. I'd forgotten that one. I agree with your comments about it, scrabblequeen. I haven't seen JULIA AND JULIA yet, though my brother and his wife loved it and are urging me to see it asap. I just know I'm going to love it though. I used to love BONES, precisely because of the chemistry. Though I never liked the books. But since I read that the guy in bones, the FBI agent, had an affair while married (his wife was pregnant at the time) with the same bimbo who nudged a million bucks out of Tiger Woods, I kiind of can't stand watching him anymore. But that's just me.
My recent post Monday Review- TO FETCH A THIEF by Spencer Quinn
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I'm watching True Blood (and loving it!) and have only recently started reading the books. I'm with you that I prefer the TV series, but hey, I'm currently obsessed by it so I'll read them all :) The only film I thought was better than the book was The English Patient by Michael Ondaatje. But maybe that's because I'd seen the film first.
My recent post Slightly Peckish Tuesday
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails
 
Home | Gallery | Tutorials | Freebies | About Us | Contact Us

Copyright © 2009 A Little Bookish |Designed by Templatemo |Converted to blogger by BloggerThemes.Net

Usage Rights

DesignBlog BloggerTheme comes under a Creative Commons License.This template is free of charge to create a personal blog.You can make changes to the templates to suit your needs.But You must keep the footer links Intact.